Oh, E. P, the master of the email copy...
"Attraction isn't a choice". Haven't seen that sentence in a loooong time. When I first got into this I absolutely loved it.

It's all about semantics, isn't it?
Being nice for DD or Rob Glover = a reactive and weak guy, wussy.
Being nice in the context of this thread= being a good guy.

After going through the process of "unwussying" myself I don't really like the idea of being a nice guy - I see me as a pretty good guy, though.
It's all about the intentions.

Being nice in my book is when i do something and i really expect absolutely nothing in return.

if i dont feel comfortable of doing something then i simply will not do it.

I'm a giver. However, there's condition when i will give. I will give to people who need but i rarely give to people who wants.

For example: One of my friend was homeless and he was at the airport in LA. He asked me to drive him to a friends house so he can have a place to stay and some food to eat. I drove him there, ask nothing in return and EVEN give him some money for food for a while. After I was done with it, i literally ask nothing and expect nothing out of it. I felt it was a moral obligation to help a friend in need.

Fast forward 6 months later when he was completely financially secure. He asked me to drive him to a party so he could party...to me, partying is a luxury and completely "unneeded" so i told him if he needed a ride this time, he must pay me 40 bucks for the amount of work i'm going to do for him.

For me, this is exactly how i treat women. If they needed my help, then i would help and expect absolutely nothing from them. However, if they approached me and "wanted" a free drink, then i would tell them to buy one for me first or make themselves useful to me in someway, like get me other girls. There's no covert contract involve. A need is free...a want has a price. That is my definition of being "nice"

That DD message struck a cord with me when I first read it. It aroused some emotions in me, even though I quit reading and listening to him more than 1,5 years ago...
It reminded me why I spent so long listening to the guy's products.

He is pretty powerful at pacing his readers and them leading them.
All the repetition, going back and forth, drilling down his ideas.
The cognitive dissonance push the reader away from the touchy-feely advice and their mom's advice.
He gets the reader visualizing a successful outcome.
DD establishes his own example as a precedent. "I was ill, shocked and now you too can be good with women"

He does know how to push the right buttons at a very primitive level. No wonder that people react strongly to him...

He's great at swaying guys, that's for sure.