![]() |
|
Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Printable Version +- Practical Pick Up Forums (http://www.practicalpickup.com/forum) +-- Forum: General Forums (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Lifestyle, Career and Health (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) (/showthread.php?tid=269) |
RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - matty - 04-30-2011 11:00 PM (04-30-2011 06:32 PM)Happy Wrote:(04-30-2011 12:58 PM)matty Wrote: I will tell you that if you attempt this endeavour, you should heed Sisson's advice about keeping your fat intake high. If you attempt to keep both your fat intake low while only eating Veggie's and Fruit for carbs, your going to be absolutely miserable. I did this the first time I tried the Primal Blueprint, and by day three I was so miserable and depressed, i had to go off it. Tried it again with the fat intake bumped up....much more pleasant I'm not sure exactly what my fat intake amounted to. On my second go around on the Primal Blueprint, I was eating my eggs with all the yolks, cooking with butter, using olive oil and never trimming fat off my meat, which made the fact that my carb intake was low much more pleasant. On the other hand, I know people who use the high protein, moderate carb plan you describe with fantastic results and they do great on it. Millage probably varies from person to person. All I know is that for me, bumping the fat up yielded significant results, and had no negative implications for weight loss. RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Happy - 04-30-2011 11:12 PM (04-30-2011 11:00 PM)matty Wrote:(04-30-2011 06:32 PM)Happy Wrote:(04-30-2011 12:58 PM)matty Wrote: I will tell you that if you attempt this endeavour, you should heed Sisson's advice about keeping your fat intake high. If you attempt to keep both your fat intake low while only eating Veggie's and Fruit for carbs, your going to be absolutely miserable. I did this the first time I tried the Primal Blueprint, and by day three I was so miserable and depressed, i had to go off it. Tried it again with the fat intake bumped up....much more pleasant I do get what you are saying. There can be negative implications for some who take this "fat is good" message, that is widespread amongst the paleo community, too far and hamper their progress. Your fat intake was obviously low enough to allow an energy deficit, so the diet worked well. I did not describe a no fat approach btw, but an intake range that covers the sweet spot of fat intake for most (be it fat loss, maintenance or muscle gain). Seen that far too often so I just wanted to provide some overall context. RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - matty - 04-30-2011 11:45 PM (04-30-2011 11:12 PM)Happy Wrote:(04-30-2011 11:00 PM)matty Wrote:(04-30-2011 06:32 PM)Happy Wrote:(04-30-2011 12:58 PM)matty Wrote: I will tell you that if you attempt this endeavour, you should heed Sisson's advice about keeping your fat intake high. If you attempt to keep both your fat intake low while only eating Veggie's and Fruit for carbs, your going to be absolutely miserable. I did this the first time I tried the Primal Blueprint, and by day three I was so miserable and depressed, i had to go off it. Tried it again with the fat intake bumped up....much more pleasant Good point. While a don't really measure or track these, I strongly suspect your right about the calorie deficit, as I usually felt quite satiated and wasn't needing to eat as much. RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Altitude - 05-09-2011 08:49 AM (04-30-2011 06:41 PM)Happy Wrote:(04-30-2011 07:05 AM)Altitude Wrote:(04-30-2011 02:20 AM)Happy Wrote: The really interesting part isn't that much what is bad for you, but what "too much" exactly is and why. And how to get people to change their behaviour. Sorry for late reply broheim. I've realised I can't focus on fitness that much for the next 3 or so months because of exams . Anyway I found something useful for skinny guys. http://jcdfitness.com/2009/11/the-muscle-building-guide-for-skinny-guys-part-one/. This guy, I believe, is legit. And what do you mean by 'try abs out'?
RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Happy - 05-10-2011 12:59 AM Try having abs and how your life changes when you have them. (hint: very little, but it looks neat) Many overestimate the impact that getting fit, rich etc. makes to their lives. (Still worth doing it though) JC is one of the good guys. RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Jon - 05-10-2011 01:07 AM (05-10-2011 12:59 AM)Happy Wrote: Many overestimate the impact that getting fit, rich etc. makes to their lives. (Still worth doing it though) I agree with this if you mean guys overestimate how much more success they will get with women just because they see a washboard stomach - that said, I think many guys underestimate the benefits in life in general about being fit: more energy, get sick less, have a healthier general look, more fashion options, you do not project laziness, more self-confidence, can lead to better body language, etc. RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Brian - 05-10-2011 08:29 AM Actually, imo, most community guys underestimate the benefits of becoming fit. I've looked at bodybuilding.com and it seem the guys there on average gets laid with more women than most pua...and hotter women too. RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Happy - 05-11-2011 02:32 AM (05-10-2011 08:29 AM)Brian Wrote: Actually, imo, most community guys underestimate the benefits of becoming fit. Yes. Somebody on bodybuilding.com is getting laid? ![]() There is some truth in the stereotype of the shy, socially incompetent bodybuilder. RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Jon - 05-11-2011 02:48 AM What is kind of funny is that it seems like women's preference is not primarily for big and ripped. It seems to either be: big guys who are trim but not super lean, and don't have super-defined six packs (hugh jackman, javier bardem, john Hamm), or relatively lean guys who are really ripped but don't have huge muscles (ryan reynolds, brad pitt). Guys, for the most part, tend to be oblivious to this fact. RE: Mark Sisson's blog(fitness and nutrition) - Happy - 05-11-2011 03:55 AM I don't think being ripped will be a deal breaker. Look at Bale in American Psycho. IMO it got more to do with the fact that movie stars have not enough time to cut down before the filming. You can't gain the insane amounts of muscle you see in most muscle/fitness magazines without great genes AND drugs anyway. Even if you do everything right, few will be "too big" sans drugs. Men overestimate how attractive a lot of muscle mass is (fitness mags are targeted towards men after all) and girl overestimate how thin we like them (cosmo, vogue etc.). http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/haselton/webdocs/frederickbodyimage.pdf But when do people see your abs anyway? On the beach or only after she already chose you. Being ripped looks pretty neat though.
|